Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Nov 2010 22:48 UTC, submitted by Michael
Linux "In recent weeks and months there has been quite a bit of work towards improving the responsiveness of the Linux desktop with some very significant milestones building up recently and new patches continuing to come. This work is greatly improving the experience of the Linux desktop when the computer is withstanding a great deal of CPU load and memory strain. Fortunately, the exciting improvements are far from over. There is a new patch that has not yet been merged but has undergone a few revisions over the past several weeks and it is quite small - just over 200 lines of code - but it does wonders for the Linux desktop."
Thread beginning with comment 450316
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by Fergy on Wed 17th Nov 2010 14:22 UTC in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
Fergy
Member since:
2006-04-10

Maybe, maybe not? No-one opens 2000 Nautilus windows and no-one watches 10 movies and listens to 50 MP3's at the same time.
Maybe Linux is more concerned with being actaully usefull rather han boasting pointless accomplishments.

If you gave Win95 32MB of memory and a P200 it would run really nice and as long as you didn't do too much(more than 1 heavy program) with it. Now if I have a system with 3200MB of memory and 4x a P2000 I should in theory be able to do at least 10x as much without any stutters.
Something went wrong with multitasking desktops and this patch seems so be a big step towards fixing it.

Edited 2010-11-17 14:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: BeOS like ?
by helf on Wed 17th Nov 2010 14:44 in reply to "RE[2]: BeOS like ?"
helf Member since:
2005-07-06

My pentium 75 laptop with 40mb of ram running windows 95 begs to differ :p

(I run windows since the CT65565 video card has crap linux support and I don't wanna just run with a cli)

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: BeOS like ?
by Fergy on Wed 17th Nov 2010 14:51 in reply to "RE[3]: BeOS like ?"
Fergy Member since:
2006-04-10

My pentium 75 laptop with 40mb of ram running windows 95 begs to differ :p

(I run windows since the CT65565 video card has crap linux support and I don't wanna just run with a cli)

Do you mean that win95 did not run smooth with 32MB and P200 or that higher specs 40MB did not even run smooth?

Your reply answers nothing and raises at least 2 questions.

Reply Parent Score: 1