Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Nov 2010 23:37 UTC, submitted by comay
Thread beginning with comment 450376
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Also, ZFS gives very good data safety. Here are some problems hardware raid Enterprise had
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/11/16/on-the-perils-of-uni...




Member since:
2005-07-11
BtrFS is still 5 years away from achieving feature parity with ZFSv15 (latest available in FreeBSD 8.x), possibly longer to reach parity with ZFSv31 (latest available from Oracle).
There's no way they'd turf ZFS and try to switch all their development resources to BtrFS.
After all, that eliminates a reason to use Solaris, which eliminates the need for all those expensive licenses, and all those sales of expensive hardware.
ZFS is opensource, it's not going anywhere. ZFSv28, which includes everything except crypto support, is already "in the wild". Oracle can't close it up and make it disappear. There are even experimental patches for using ZFSv28 in FreeBSD 9-CURRENT, with the goal of having it integrated into the 9.0 release in 2011.
Nexenta is available now with ZFS. It's not going anywhere.
GreenBytes uses ZFS in their storage products. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
There are others. It's too late to put the genie back in the bottle. And it's too long to wait for BtrFS to catch up.
There are even two separate projects underway to bring ZFS to Linux as an out-of-tree kernel module.
IOW, there's nothing to worry about.
Edited 2010-11-17 22:42 UTC