To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
MeeGo is for high end smartphones ie, the area in which iOS and Android compete.
Symbian is for low end, ie the area in which Nokia is currently the largest mobile phone manufacturer in the world by volume.
There is a gray area in between right now, but I think once MeeGo actually gets finished and Nokia ships a phone with MeeGo on it, the distinction will become clear.
No, he doesn't mention MeeGo. He says Nokia was too late in adopting touch screens and is therefore still associated by consumers with physical keyboards.
Personally, I like touch screens, but I don't like to input text on them. That's why I own a Nokia phone with a touch screen and a keyboard :-)
I've read a some reviews of recent nokia phones and have some friends with N900, N95 etc.
All what I see is a crap full of bugs.
I've negative experience with early nokia smartphones - it just hung twice while I walked through menues at first boot (only accum removal helps to reset after the freeze).
Edited 2010-11-19 12:20 UTC
I can criticize Nokia, even though I have stocks, and even though I know about MeeGo.
MeeGo 1.2 is suppose to have all applications, and be ready in April. N8 was very late. Symbian^3 was late.
Go figure.
MeeGo phones real soon now? Don't think so.
Also Nokia has tried to sell services with their phones earlier, has it ever worked?





Member since:
2008-10-30
So, can you talk a little more about Nokia being left behind?
Does he mentioned anything about MeeGo? Because anybody who criticizes Nokia, without taking Meego in consideration, just have an invalid argument for me...
Edited 2010-11-18 17:23 UTC