Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 22nd Nov 2010 19:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 450817
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Lets hope attachment isn't stupid
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 23rd Nov 2010 00:55
in reply to "RE: Lets hope attachment isn't stupid"
RE[3]: Lets hope attachment isn't stupid
by UltraZelda64 on Tue 23rd Nov 2010 16:07
in reply to "RE[2]: Lets hope attachment isn't stupid"
Damn it, ever since you pointed out the original poster's reading mistake, now I keep reading the company name as Attachment! Before then, I always read it correctly. Now I keep thinking for a couple seconds after reading the name, "wait, there's something wrong..." and then have to correct myself.
It is very similar though, don't know how or why pointing someone else's mistake caused endless mistakes the way I read it... I actually remember even misreading the original poster's "Attachment" as "Attachmate" before. Man, I must be all f***ed up now. LOL.
Edited 2010-11-23 16:10 UTC





Member since:
2007-09-22
I think they are called Attachmate and not attachment. Just wanted to point that out.