Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Nov 2010 17:58 UTC, submitted by visitor
Thread beginning with comment 451026
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: They'll never get the Enterprise
by fepede on Wed 24th Nov 2010 20:10
in reply to "RE: They'll never get the Enterprise"
RE[3]: They'll never get the Enterprise
by Delgarde on Wed 24th Nov 2010 20:19
in reply to "RE[2]: They'll never get the Enterprise"
Being stable doesn't mean being old.
It does, somewhat. Stability means finding a combination of packages that works, and sticking with it. And typically, that means that those concerned with stability tend to be one or two releases out of date - upgrading only once the version they're on is end-of-lifed by the vendor.
RE[3]: They'll never get the Enterprise
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 24th Nov 2010 22:01
in reply to "RE[2]: They'll never get the Enterprise"
RE[3]: They'll never get the Enterprise
by Lennie on Wed 24th Nov 2010 22:03
in reply to "RE[2]: They'll never get the Enterprise"




Member since:
2005-08-12
Because if it's old it means it's stable. Like Windows 98.