To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There was a court order. They received a warrant from a district court and proceeded with executing that order.
Folks, when people steal other peoples stuff, it needs to be dealt with, or we have anarchy. How would you like to spend your whole life working on your talents, finally be able to produce stuff that people want and then not be able to charge for it. That's wrong, and what the torrent nerds are doing is wrong.
I'm happy to see some enforcement of the law, and am happy to see it being done the right way.
Now with that said, what does concern me are the vast number of agencies and the searches and seizures that occur without probable cause and without a warrant (TSA airport screening). This is very troublesome. It is as if the idea of a Representative Republic exists in name only. This TSA has no accountability to the law and the 4th amendment. This is a problem and a serious one. And this kind of power needs to be checked and challenged.
We need the law and the enforcement of the law. We cannot have anarchy, but we also cannot have a dictatorship either.
But, the owner did not receive a notice of the warrant, which, as far as I understand it, is necessary.
Copyright infringement is not stealing. It's copyright infringement. If it were indeed stealing, we would not be seeing such ridiculous damages.
"There's much to be said for this view of "dealing with" piracy—which is why we have long argued that the judgments handed down in P2P lawsuits against twenty-something music fans have been ludicrous. $1.92 million? $675,000? No one walking out of a Walmart with a stack of Richard Marx discs under his arm would be subject to such penalties."
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/08/obama-administratio...
I agree with you about the TSA. They have one... caveat, if you will... that allows them to circumvent what would normally be a clear cut privacy violations case. No airport within the US is obligated to use the TSA. You are, in essence, giving implied consent to be searched by utilizing an airport that choses to use TSA for security. There is nothing in the law that says that airports, which are not government owned, have to use TSA. In fact, some congressmen are calling for airports to drop TSA completely and go with private security... and some airports are considering it.
I would recommend reading, or possibly re-reading, the definition of anarchy:
http://anarchism.pageabode.com/afaq/secA1.html#seca11
I would also like to point out that Copyright Infingement != Theft! See:
http://www.osnews.com/thread?451308





Member since:
2005-06-29
Some sites were closed off WITHOUT even a notice or a court order. How would you like it if the police seized all your belongings, without notice, without a court order?
Apparently, you are a-okay with such actions. I suggest you move to China or North Korea, you'll feel right at home there.