Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 10:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 451363
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-02-05
"The US has started seizing the domain names of various websites through ICANN"
ICANN is responsible for a subset of top-level domains (specifically, the generic and some sponsored TLDs), not for the names inside those domains. It looks like all the second-level domains that were shut down were in .COM and .NET, both run by VeriSign. It could be the Feds went to VeriSign and said "remove these domains" and they did so. Only VeriSign has the ability to modify the contents of the .COM and .NET zones. It is a bit surprising VeriSign acted without a court order, but presumably their corporate lawyers saw following US government requests to be (understandably) in the corporate best interest.
Or, it could be that the Feds went to GoDaddy and GoDaddy initiated the removal. In this case, VeriSign most likely wouldn't have known anything about it since add/modify/delete requests are fully automated.
In either case, it is very unlikely ICANN was even aware of the action and even if they were, they'd have no role one way or another to stop it.
Why GoDaddy blamed ICANN is a bit of a question, however it could be because .COM/.NET are the most desirable TLDs and GoDaddy didn't want to risk their relationship with VeriSign. It's always easy to hate on ICANN.