Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 27th Nov 2010 10:46 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 451410
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Sausage
by _txf_ on Sun 28th Nov 2010 03:33
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Sausage"
Sigh...
No, copyrights are about COPIES hence the term copyright. Say you use some photo or graphic that has been copyrighted in your website, are you actually stealing the photo? NO, it still exists but you have used it without the authors permission.
If it were stealing then the author would no longer have the graphic for his own use.
RE[6]: Comment by Sausage
by stone2020 on Sun 28th Nov 2010 03:44
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Sausage"
Say you use some photo or graphic that has been copyrighted in your website, are you actually stealing the photo? NO, it still exists but you have used it without the authors permission.
Logic fail. Why does he need the copyright on the website? He is OK with copyright infringement. It is OK by him then that I can copy his whole website and just put it a different domain. So please Thom if you truly believe it's not stealing, take the copyright off your website.




Member since:
2005-09-23
But yet you have this on your site:
© 1997-2010 OSNews LLC. All Rights Reserved. OSNews and the OSNews logo are trademarks of OSNews.
Source Code © 2007-2010, Adam Scheinberg, except where noted
Why would you ever need that on your site if you believe that copyright infringement is not stealing?