Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Nov 2010 23:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 451734
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yah, and the road to hell are paved with good intentions. Apple has a long history of exerting restrictions on their customers and excessive control of their products after the fact.
Why should they have the benefit of the doubt, especially when it appears to be simply limiting choice only?!
God I hate the blogosphere these days.
Why should they have the benefit of the doubt
I think everyone should be given the benefit of the doubt, after all if you automatically assume that a person or a company is always doing evil based on past actions, even if every past action is evil, you're still being illogical. Given that not everything Apple has ever done is evil, and in fact they've got as decent a track record as Microsoft and arguably a better one than Sony, I'd say they well deserve to be seen from both sides.
Of course, I'm going to be labled an Apple fanboy/apologist by some based on that sentiment, just as I have been labeled the same regarding Microsoft and IBM in the past, but that would only serve to further prove my point.
All that said, I'm quite curious to see just how Apple will explain how this is not stifling an open market, or if they indeed will even respond to questions about it. I know that it's a good feeling to be able to replace the just failed DVD burner in my self-assembled computer with a faster, more capable model without restriction. It's one of the many reasons I'll never go exclusively Mac.





Member since:
2006-05-21
Yah let's just assume it's all about control and closing off the Mac platform, and not that there's some good intentions in preventing drives from killing the Macbook Air.
God I hate the blogosphere these days.