Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Nov 2010 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 451788
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
But... wasn't it obvious that, being based on the FreeBSD kernel, Debian GNU/kFreeBSD would inherit support for ZFS? I'm not surprised at all by this "news" that ZFS is supported in their kFreeBSD-based distro. What I *am* surprised about is that it apparently wasn't already supported a while ago.
Don't forget access to PF and IPFW. And, one would hope anyway, GEOM.
Unfortunately, they put the GNU userland on top.
There's just so many things done better in the BSD userland (like ifconfig, vmstat -i, bsdtar, nc, a bunch more I can't think of right now but that irritate me to no end when I try to access them on Linux systems).
(There's just so many things done better in the BSD userland (like ifconfig, vmstat -i, bsdtar, nc, a bunch more I can't think of right now but that irritate me to no end when I try to access them on Linux systems).
And my university's FreeBSD machines can't even run top properly (no output, sole thing to do is Ctl+C) and take ages to boot as soon as there's a single small package update because they absolutely have to do that at boot time.
Not to mention that everything slows down to death when you're running out of disk quota, even though there's still plenty of RAM available.
I'm sure that a properly configured BSD does not have these issues, what I'm trying to say is that maybe your issues with Linux do not come from Linux software as a whole, and you'd find a properly configured Linux system more interesting.
Edited 2010-12-03 13:58 UTC





Member since:
2005-11-02
Finally we have an answer to the question "But why would your use Debian GNU/kFreeBSD in favor of Debian GNU/Linux?" Well, now all of you ZFS fans have a reason.