Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 6th Dec 2010 00:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452482
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm not following, you said that 'it turns out that it's not so easy to write a peer-to-peer network that doesn't rely on a central server', of which kamdelia is an example. The current user base is likely not indicitative of the capacity of this decentralized network but rather that it's not bigger due to competition from Bittorrent (and Rapidshare based upon what the RIAA/MPAA are shouting about these days). Emule is a peer 2 peer client for file transmission, but the kademlia decentralized network could obviously transmit any type of data between it's peers.
My mistake; when I said 'network', I assumed that implied a social network, not a file distribution network. (And I wish I could still edit my post to clear it up.)
Edited 2010-12-07 15:29 UTC




Member since:
2006-01-24
I'm not following, you said that 'it turns out that it's not so easy to write a peer-to-peer network that doesn't rely on a central server', of which kamdelia is an example. The current user base is likely not indicitative of the capacity of this decentralized network but rather that it's not bigger due to competition from Bittorrent (and Rapidshare based upon what the RIAA/MPAA are shouting about these days). Emule is a peer 2 peer client for file transmission, but the kademlia decentralized network could obviously transmit any type of data between it's peers.