Linked by Elv13 on Tue 7th Dec 2010 22:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452526
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Application names
by umccullough on Tue 7th Dec 2010 23:00
in reply to "RE: Application names"
Word is a trademark, not Words. Trademark are only on the exact same spelling.
This is not true at all. If one can demonstrate that a name is similar enough to be confusing within the same industry, then there's a good case for trademark infringement.
It is why Adida or Addidas are legal brand even if it look like Adidas (this example is getting old).
Never heard that example personally - assuming these are shoe brands, and being distributed in a country where the Adidas brand is trademarked, they have an extremely compelling case there. However, if they don't pursue it legally, then they forfeit the ability to enforce their trademark against these names after a period of time.
RE[3]: Application names
by Delgarde on Wed 8th Dec 2010 02:07
in reply to "RE[2]: Application names"
This is not true at all. If one can demonstrate that a name is similar enough to be confusing within the same industry, then there's a good case for trademark infringement.
If 'Word' with a 'K' at the front wasn't similar enough to upset Microsoft, I don't imagine 'Word' with an 's' at the end will bother them too much...
RE[3]: Application names
by Neolander on Wed 8th Dec 2010 08:40
in reply to "RE[2]: Application names"
RE[3]: Application names
by terrakotta on Wed 8th Dec 2010 14:08
in reply to "RE[2]: Application names"





Member since:
2006-06-12
Word is a trademark, not Words. Trademark are only on the exact same spelling. It is why Adida or Addidas are legal brand even if it look like Adidas (this example is getting old).