Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Internet & Networking It looks like several companies are learning what happens when you mess with the internet - and they're learning it the hard way. Several major companies have been hit by the collective powers of Anonymous after 4chan launched several distributed denial-of-service attacks. What many have been predicting for a long time now has finally happened: an actual war between the powers that be on one side, and the internet on the other. Update: PayPal has admitted their WikiLeaks snub came after pressure from the US government, and Datacell, which takes care of payments to Wikileaks, is threatening to sue MasterCard over Wikileaks' account suspension. Update II: Visa.com is down due to the attack. Update III: PayPal has caved under the pressure, and will release the funds in the WikiLeaks account.
Thread beginning with comment 452756
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Guilty of treason
by ralph on Wed 8th Dec 2010 18:31 UTC in reply to "Guilty of treason"
ralph
Member since:
2005-07-10

J If one person dies from the compromised security of any leaked document he is guilty of treason and the US constitution makes the death penalty the punishment.


Jesus, repeat after me: Julian Assange is not a US-citizen, he cannot commit treason against the United States.

Julian Assange is not a US-citizen, he cannot commit treason against the United States.

Julian Assange is not a US-citizen, he cannot commit treason against the United States.

Julian Assange is not a US-citizen, he cannot commit treason against the United States.

Julian Assange is not a US-citizen, he cannot commit treason against the United States.



People who say its okay to give compromising information and endanger them I have serious problems with.

Who says this? Wikileaks, who have repeatedly asked the Pentagon to help them redact the documents before they are released so that nobody is harmed?

Wikileaks, who redact the documents they release working together with irresponsible organizations like the Guardian, Spiegel, El Pais and Le Monde in redacting the documents?

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[2]: Guilty of treason
by MollyC on Thu 9th Dec 2010 06:49 in reply to "RE: Guilty of treason"
MollyC Member since:
2006-07-04

Nice talking point (I don't know if it's true or not), but Assange is a citizen of Australia last I heard, and he's released diplomatic cables between the US and Australia, so he's committed treason against Australia, no? Or yes?

Also, Australia, New Zealand, and the US are members of ANZUS (an alliance like NATO). By undercutting the security of the US, Assange undercuts the security of ANZUS, which would be treason against Australia too. Not that Australia will charge him with treason, but might see reason to do so, depending on what he leaks.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Guilty of treason
by lemur2 on Thu 9th Dec 2010 10:17 in reply to "RE[2]: Guilty of treason"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Nice talking point (I don't know if it's true or not), but Assange is a citizen of Australia last I heard, and he's released diplomatic cables between the US and Australia, so he's committed treason against Australia, no? Or yes?

Also, Australia, New Zealand, and the US are members of ANZUS (an alliance like NATO). By undercutting the security of the US, Assange undercuts the security of ANZUS, which would be treason against Australia too. Not that Australia will charge him with treason, but might see reason to do so, depending on what he leaks.


Australia says U.S, not WikiLeaks founder, responsible for leaks
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL3E6N80BW20101208?sp=true
The Australian government on Wednesday blamed the United States, not the WikiLeaks founder, for the unauthorised release of about 250,000 secret U.S. diplomatic cables and said those who originally leaked the documents were legally liable.

Reply Parent Score: 2