Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452761
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Say it isn't so, Thom
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 18:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Say it isn't so, Thom"
Now, let's turn the tables: show me anywhere in US Law that says that it is perfectly legal to steal sensitive or "Secret" information or documentation, or to be in legal posession of sensitive or "Secret" information when you have no such clearance.
Erm, that's massively idiotic. You cannot find a law that WikiLeaks has broken, so you ask us to find a law that which makes WikiLeaks' work legal?
Unlawyered.
RE[4]: Say it isn't so, Thom
by FresheBakked on Wed 8th Dec 2010 19:07
in reply to "RE[3]: Say it isn't so, Thom"
Thom - Being illegally in posession of "Secret" and classified material *IS* prosecutable:
http://newyork.fbi.gov/dojpressrel/pressrel08/translatersent051908....
That's just for starters.





Member since:
2010-12-08
The US Government - and all Governments, if you like - have the inate right to protect against the public disclosure of sensitive or "Secret" information. The UK has a "Official Secrets Act", as well as many other countries around the world. The US does *not* at this time have such an Act or codified law on the books at this time, due to leftist / liberal members of the US Congress who have repeatedly killed such bills, but this does not mean that the theft and acquisition of items classified as "Secret" is legal...or RIGHT.
Now, let's turn the tables: show me anywhere in US Law that says that it is perfectly legal to steal sensitive or "Secret" information or documentation, or to be in legal posession of sensitive or "Secret" information when you have no such clearance.