Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452782
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Completely disagree
by Bounty on Wed 8th Dec 2010 19:49
in reply to "RE[4]: Completely disagree"
You miss an important point in your analogy:
... stole some "100% public funded" software...
... stole some "100% public funded" software...
Why do you assume "the public" would want that software published freely to everyone?
Lets say the government of Nauru published some software we'll call it World of Warcraft. Would a majority of it's people want to charge for it, or open it's source?
RE[6]: Completely disagree
by phoudoin on Wed 8th Dec 2010 19:59
in reply to "RE[5]: Completely disagree"
True.
In democracy, in the end, it's always up to the people.
But how could he do such choice if the existence itself of this software is hidden by his own government, which people pay too to works for them (theorically)?!
What happend when - always justified for your own *security* - your choice, your weight in the nation decision process, is stolen by your government (and the next, the next after him, etc) ?
Talk about stolen stuffs...





Member since:
2006-06-09
You miss an important point in your analogy:
... stole some "100% public funded" software...