To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It has been argued that the term "civil disobedience" has always suffered from ambiguity and in modern times, become utterly debased. Marshall Cohen notes, "It has been used to describe everything from bringing a test-case in the federal courts to taking aim at a federal official. Indeed, for Vice President Agnew it has become a code-word describing the activities of muggers, arsonists, draft evaders, campaign hecklers, campus militants, anti-war demonstrators, juvenile delinquents and political assassins."[14
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_disobediance
I don't think it's definition is as clear cut as you make it sound.
Yeah, I should have stated that I was trying to stick to the original usage, as recommended by Ghandi and Dr. King.
That said, I do advocate slightly more extreme-yet-still-non-violent-methods.
How far? I need to think about that further, but I think these attacks are justified.




Member since:
2010-05-19
Did you read your own post?
"the refusal to obey certain laws"
That was pretty awesome.
Edited 2010-12-08 22:32 UTC