Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452906
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
How about massive spying campaign on the world leaders - like their DNA! If they were spying on how some negotiations went, what confidential views someone had, that would be expected and nothing to be shamed about, but this is ridiculous!
I would call that good espionage. Since US has to deal all countries in world, especially some shady african and middle-east countries, collecting DNA information is vital. Collecting personal information of world leaders is hardly new, they did it during cold war already.
Oh, and BTW, if WikiLeaks have not shown anything "new", then why the smear campaign on behalf of US government? Think about it, they are panicking over something, it's not just hot air.
Sigh, naive naive. You don't think that some republican washout politican wouldn't see this as great way to increase his points in public view? Ofc they do. Also Wikileaks have released some info they shouldn't, like internal threat analysis.
They aren't panicking, they are just worried that cable information would/will harm diplomacy, like it has already. There is reason why diplomatic cables are meant to be secure, they are like personal letters. They allow diplomats to share there view of country/person without using diplomatic language that would hinder the actual information.
There is reason why diplomatic cables are meant to be secure, they are like personal letters. They allow diplomats to share there view of country/person without using diplomatic language that would hinder the actual information.
There is a reason why diplomats are diplomats - they use diplomatic language always. Most cables are actually written quite well, just there are some "pearls" that came out of some idiots(or politicians turned "diplomats" - I personally hate talking to those). And information does not get hindered if it's written in an objective tone, while there are quite a few cables that are written in an unprofessional manner.




Member since:
2009-05-19
How about massive spying campaign on the world leaders - like their DNA! If they were spying on how some negotiations went, what confidential views someone had, that would be expected and nothing to be shamed about, but this is ridiculous!
Oh, and BTW, if WikiLeaks have not shown anything "new", then why the smear campaign on behalf of US government? Think about it, they are panicking over something, it's not just hot air.
Edited 2010-12-09 05:52 UTC