Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Dec 2010 12:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 452929
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: PayPal clarifies that US did NOT pressure them.
by b00gie on Thu 9th Dec 2010 16:14
in reply to "PayPal clarifies that US did NOT pressure them."
RE[2]: PayPal clarifies that US did NOT pressure them.
by lemur2 on Thu 9th Dec 2010 22:41
in reply to "RE: PayPal clarifies that US did NOT pressure them."
it's pretty funny cause i thought that USA actually had laws and judges who were the only responsible to determine if something is illegal, i guess i was wrong.
What happens though if it is the USA itself which is doing the illegal things?
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,733630,00.html




Member since:
2006-07-04
See the UPDATE to this story, here: http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/08/paypal-wikileaks/
The original story was that the US State Dept wrote a letter to PayPal saying that the State Dept deemed Wikileaks to be engaging in illegal activity, and therefore PayPal suspended Wikileaks' PayPal account.
But no, it turns out that the State Dept wrote a letter to Wikileaks, saying that they deemed that Wikileaks was engaged in illegalities, and based on that letter from the State Dept to Wikileaks (not from the State Dept to PayPal), PayPal decided to suspend Wikileaks' PayPal account. The US State Dept made no contact with PayPal.
I await Thom's update to his summary of events according to PayPal's clarification.
Edited 2010-12-09 08:19 UTC