Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Dec 2010 22:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 453116
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Corporate dictatorship?
by Bounty on Fri 10th Dec 2010 17:48
in reply to "Corporate dictatorship?"
"
So, Visa and co can use their own resources to identify people involved in the attacks, and hand police a list of names.
So, Visa and co can use their own resources to identify people involved in the attacks, and hand police a list of names.
This sounds to me more like a corporate dictatorship. A privately owned corporation gives the police a "list" of people "involved in the attacks". That would be the end of constitutionality (not necessary the end of "democracy") if those practices became reality because those "lists" are used in Red China too... "
My guess is that they more likely gave evidence. I honestly hope Wikileaks does the same. DDOSing is a combination of dumb and illegal. I actually hope it continues just enough to force the FBI (or other authorities) to re-tool themselves and develop the willpower enough to actually go after internet attackers.




Member since:
2006-10-27
So, Visa and co can use their own resources to identify people involved in the attacks, and hand police a list of names.
This sounds to me more like a corporate dictatorship. A privately owned corporation gives the police a "list" of people "involved in the attacks". That would be the end of constitutionality (not necessary the end of "democracy") if those practices became reality because those "lists" are used in Red China too...