Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 453342
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Calling Lindows a competitor is being too kind. It was a scummy outfit with a crappy Linux distro. It was one of those cases where the law was with Lindows, but the moral high ground was with Microsoft.
Lindows was supposed to be a miraculous Linux based Windows clone that was 100% compatible with windows applications. It was non free ( $50- $100 yearly) linux distro that sucked.
Well, it has some good feature (Linspire), but it was OpenSourced too late. It really had some of Windows good features and discoverability of new apps directly in the app (and an app store). But the fork of Mozilla/OpenOffice/KDE was terrible.
Now, Xandros+Linspire seem even more doomed than ever.




Member since:
2007-07-14
I still hold out some hope that the United States Supreme Court will put an end to this nonsense here in the US of A...
Unfortunately The glass-half-empty part of me thinks that by the time Software patents are invalidated in the US, Some other significant parts of the world will have finished legitimizing them.
And good old Microsoft have not shied away in the past from shopping for some obscure international venue to attack a competitor.
(Remember Lindows/Lispire?)