Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Mono Project For the most time, I've been firmly in the largest camp when it comes to the Mono debate - the 'I don't care'-camp. With patent lawsuits being hotter than Lady Gaga right now, that changed. For good reason, so it seems; while firmly in the 'ZOMG-MICROSOFT-IS-T3H-EVILL!1!!ONE!'-camp, investigated the five most popular Mono applications, and the conclusion is clear: all of them implement a lot of namespaces which are not covered by Microsoft's community promise thing.
Thread beginning with comment 453349
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Big fekkin surprise
by somebody on Mon 13th Dec 2010 20:10 UTC in reply to "Big fekkin surprise"
Member since:

that's utter bull.

i'm not mono developer, but it is my preferred development environment beside vala. although i'm finding my self more and more writing in vala (if only it had reflection like .Net i'd move away from .Net long ago)

in most cases, what you hear from mono developers is complete silence and avoidance or answer with question "what is safe and not patented?". last is quite true in my eyes. everyone is so loud about mono and so quiet about other problems.

java for example is being under same wagon, now with oracle haunting it? well, it fares even worse. i don't hear people abolishing java from distributions.

trouble is that you can't write 5 lines of code and not infringe some non sense patent. in my eyes, computer patents should be abolished as there is no invention, it is pure rewrite of either normal event or behaivour in some other science. we're just using computer languages to write that.

Edited 2010-12-13 20:12 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Big fekkin surprise
by TheGZeus on Mon 13th Dec 2010 20:14 in reply to "RE: Big fekkin surprise"
TheGZeus Member since:

That first line is a perfect example of the lack of self-awareness in the Mono community.

When I said "Mono dev" I meant "dev that uses Mono".

Look back at any ML/blog discussion on the subject.
Daniel Icxzzxazxca is such a waste of O₂ that it's staggering that anyone puts up with him. The people that do are just as bad.

Edited 2010-12-13 20:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[3]: Big fekkin surprise
by Kasi on Tue 14th Dec 2010 03:59 in reply to "RE[2]: Big fekkin surprise"
Kasi Member since:

Its not like there is dearth of programming languages that are fully implemented in way that is safe to use.

I just don't understand this fascination with .NET, Mono, or Java for that matter. It seems like very on wants to pretend they are with the big boys.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

Here's the difference between Java and Mono:

Java :

+ safe to use the language, vm, ect as long as its from an approved source ( ie Open JDK, ect).

- unsafe to use a non official implementation of the "open" standard. ( aka Harmony)

- unsafe to use parts of the a non official implementation of the open standard to create a pseudo derivative product (aka Android).

Mono :

+ safe ( from Microsoft lawsuits) to use a specific subset of the language.

+ safe to use a non official implementation of the "open" standard.

- unsafe to create a 100% Microsoft compatible implementation.

The problem no one in the mono world has even thought of is the qualifier in there: Safe from Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't own all of the patents that dot net Relies on. They paid to use Sun patents as well. So even an implementation of the open standard may be subject to lawsuits from Sun/Oracle.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[2]: Big fekkin surprise
by JAlexoid on Tue 14th Dec 2010 14:35 in reply to "RE: Big fekkin surprise"
JAlexoid Member since:

java for example is being under same wagon

No... Java itself is definitely not in the same wagon. Ever read GPL? OpenJDK is GPL and is distributed by Oracle.
Apache Harmony is in the same wagon as Mono. In fact they are in wagon with less wheels... Harmony doesn't have even a "promise". Android is in a better position - due to the fact that Google is behind Android.

Reply Parent Score: 5