Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 453399
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Most people who speak of an IDE wouldn't include Emacs or VIM + *insert extension(s)* in the class of "IDE".
They usually mean "Approachable GUI IDE".
They usually mean "Approachable GUI IDE".
Pretty sure "approachable GUI IDE" is an oxymoron... I've used a few IDEs over the years, and those capable enough to be worth using tend to have a huge learning curve. Excellent for a developer willing to take time to learn his tools, but very tricky to start with - particularly if coming from the "vi + terminal" school of development.




Member since:
2010-05-19
Yeah.
However, I just... use Emacs.
Eclipse is gigantic and anything it has that Emacs lacks seems to be something I would never want.
Most people who speak of an IDE wouldn't include Emacs or VIM + *insert extension(s)* in the class of "IDE".
They usually mean "Approachable GUI IDE".
_That's_ what I'm talking about; that when people ask for a good IDE, all I can suggest is Emacs, as I know nothing about the alternatives, because I've never wanted to use one since learning Emacs.