Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 13th Dec 2010 23:11 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless It's hard to predict the future because we humans prefer to think in terms of familiar paradigms. Even the most brilliant of our species are subject to this flaw. Now, Microsoft faces its turn. The owner of the operating system that likely runs your personal computer, the company that achieved monopoly with Windows and ducked the Department of Justice's scythe to keep it, faces a midlife crisis as the world goes gaga over portable consumer devices. This is the story of what's happening to Microsoft in the handheld operating system markets -- and how it parallels the earlier, similar journeys of IBM Corporation and Digital Equipment Corporation. Can Microsoft achieve dominance on mobile devices?
Thread beginning with comment 453435
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

...nearly the exact thing was predicted regarding Microsoft and the Internet around 1994-1995.

This prompted the famous, 1995, "Internet Tidal Wave Memorandum," from Bill Gates to MS Executives. He outlined (basically) that MS had totally missed the boat when it came to the importance of the Internet and its bearing on the future of Microsoft itself.

Gates directed a massive shift of resources in order to play catch-up. And I believe they caught up quite quickly.

The difference there is that:
1. most people still didn't have internet access, where as most people now do have mobile phones

2. even though MS were lagging behind re the internet, people still bought into their core businesses (ie Windows and Office). If people buy Android or iOS handsets, MS lose business.

3. and because those people were already tied into Windows, it was relatively easy to switch them to MS's own web-products. Where as if people are using iPhones or Android, it's harder to convince them to switch to a new and unfamiliar platform.

4. and finally, I'd argue that MS haven't really caught up in regards to the internet:
4a. ok, they did gain a monopoly with IE, but that's gone again now.
4b. They've had numerous failed search engines and only now gaining any kind of presence there with Bing (and that's largely due to their deal with Yahoo),
4c. Google (et al) have eaten away their cloud-email market share,
4d. MS still don't have much of anything in the social networking.
4e. And even sharepoint seems to be struggling in the private sector - though governments have adopted it. Though I will concede that this is based purely on the jobs I've applied for in the last year so my anecdotal evidence might be misleading.

In short - I can see the logic in your comparison, but I don't really think it's a fair one.

Reply Parent Score: 3

lemur2 Member since:

even sharepoint seems to be struggling in the private sector

At the entry level, sharepoint is free, but it doesn't take long before it attracts rent (via CALs).

There are a number of very decent alternatives that do not attract rent.

One can save a fortune by not using sharepoint (even if one does use Windows).

Edited 2010-12-14 09:41 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:

The problem is finding support contracts for Alfresco.

We looked at using Alfresco and/or Umbraco and we couldn't find many companies to provide support. When asked about bug fixes, they said they would have to wait for upstream ... which obviously wasn't acceptable. Also Umbraco (especially) has very little functionality without any 3rd party components. The problem is that we won't be able to support for these 3rd party components.

Also there is the problem with licenses. A lot of components had licenses which aren't acceptable for our business. GPL is not an acceptable license for our business.

However there were plenty of companies which supported sharepoint, and there was more functionality out of the box.

Edited 2010-12-14 11:42 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

sorpigal Member since:

Only the insane use Sharepoint voluntarily. It is pure poison.

Edited 2010-12-14 13:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2