Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Dec 2010 19:27 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Mono Project For the most time, I've been firmly in the largest camp when it comes to the Mono debate - the 'I don't care'-camp. With patent lawsuits being hotter than Lady Gaga right now, that changed. For good reason, so it seems; while firmly in the 'ZOMG-MICROSOFT-IS-T3H-EVILL!1!!ONE!'-camp, The-Source.com investigated the five most popular Mono applications, and the conclusion is clear: all of them implement a lot of namespaces which are not covered by Microsoft's community promise thing.
Thread beginning with comment 453508
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Mono is safe to use.
by dylansmrjones on Tue 14th Dec 2010 15:49 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Mono is safe to use."
dylansmrjones
Member since:
2005-10-02

mono is safe.

At least according to Microsoft: “The type of action Oracle is taking against Google over Java is not going to happen,” said Tom Hanrahan of Microsoft’s Open Source Technology Centre. “If a .NET port to Android was through Mono it would fall under [the Microsoft Community Promise] Agreement”.

http://www.developerfusion.com/news/85355/microsoft-says-net-on-and...

http://www.techworld.com.au/article/358564/microsoft_won_t_stop_net...

Reply Parent Score: 3