Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 13th Dec 2010 23:11 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless It's hard to predict the future because we humans prefer to think in terms of familiar paradigms. Even the most brilliant of our species are subject to this flaw. Now, Microsoft faces its turn. The owner of the operating system that likely runs your personal computer, the company that achieved monopoly with Windows and ducked the Department of Justice's scythe to keep it, faces a midlife crisis as the world goes gaga over portable consumer devices. This is the story of what's happening to Microsoft in the handheld operating system markets -- and how it parallels the earlier, similar journeys of IBM Corporation and Digital Equipment Corporation. Can Microsoft achieve dominance on mobile devices?
Thread beginning with comment 453783
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Ummmmm....
by oiaohm on Thu 16th Dec 2010 05:12 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Ummmmm...."
oiaohm
Member since:
2009-05-30

ZzzZzzzzZZZ

CTO: We need a phone with good MS software compatibility.

Where do you think they will go?

Everyone here knows about MS Office alternatives. Everyone. You can spam a billion links but it won't change the fact that MS Office has embedded itself within enterprise world. Your open source advocacy here is a wasted endeavorer. These forums aren't frequented by enough people for it to matter and the people that do frequent them by nature explore software alternatives of all types.


Iphone, Android or Blackbery is where CTO go. Because they look cool. I do setup for CTO stuff. Last thing they bother about is if it integrates into the network. Instead they land it on IT Officers lap and says make it work don't care how.

Simple fact here. nt_jerkface you don't have arguments that hold water. MS Office is becoming less embeded all the time. Most of the issue way MS Office remains embeded is legacy and those legacy parts have a habit of breaking every time MS Office gets upgraded in a business. Reason why lot of businesses stayed on Office 2003 and did not go up to Office 2007 now being forced to go upto 2010 breakages are back. So TCO of MS Office is high. Bites every time you change version.

I don't work in 1 to 2 year time frames with lots of businesses. I have 5 to 10 year plans.

Lot of cases removing the legacy MS Office dependent parts improves stability of business operations so TCO lower.

"wasted endeavorer" I think not. I am point my customers here to show that even people like you cannot put up any logic against open source that holds water. So the people I need to see this will.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[8]: Ummmmm....
by tomcat on Thu 16th Dec 2010 21:26 in reply to "RE[7]: Ummmmm...."
tomcat Member since:
2006-01-06

MS Office is becoming less embeded all the time.


Oh, puh-lease. Most large corporations use Exchange and Sharepoint, and will continue to do so for a long time. Game over.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[9]: Ummmmm....
by oiaohm on Thu 16th Dec 2010 22:38 in reply to "RE[8]: Ummmmm...."
oiaohm Member since:
2009-05-30

"MS Office is becoming less embeded all the time.


Oh, puh-lease. Most large corporations use Exchange and Sharepoint, and will continue to do so for a long time. Game over.
"
Exchange/outlook combination yes Sharepoint no.

openchange.org is on the edge of breaking that. I am already using the proxy from openchange to improve network performance.

Notice openchange is working on drop in replacement in network to exchange. So other than the web interface change nothing else does.

Sharepoint is broken a lot by alfresco particularly alfresco business process management(BPM) That allows internal operations to be optimized quite effectively.

Due to Sharepoint lack of key features and unstablity when compared to alfresco its losing.

Also most large corporations don't use Windows servers at core. You are talking small and midsize when you are talking Exchange and Sharepoint. Mind you they are the largest section of the market.

Large can afford there own programmers to build solutions that exactly match there operations and don't have unstable solutions that don't scale well.

Its hard to except but inside 5 years Exchange will be dead as a commercial sellable product.

Binding yourself into sharepoint instead of Alfresco is only setting your self to pay more over the 5 to 10 year plans. Alfresco does not bind you to a particular server OS. So even if you are a windows shop you can still run it.

Reply Parent Score: 1