To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Cool. Useless statistics. There is no way to reliably measure OS adoption using web statistics.
Besides that, an adoption of Linux around 30% (in the mobile area) can hardly be considered a failure. Of course this is not in all countries, but nonetheless predominantly in Europe. Of course there are countries with lower adoption rates, but also countries with higher adoption rates. Which is what I wrote.
So thank you for proving me right.
EDIT: You must feel really powerful when you mod down people, right? Nothing like bashing other persons with lies, damned lies and statistics, eh?
Edited 2010-12-18 15:00 UTC
Besides that, an adoption of Linux around 30% (in the mobile area) can hardly be considered a failure. Of course this is not in all countries, but nonetheless predominantly in Europe. Of course there are countries with lower adoption rates, but also countries with higher adoption rates. Which is what I wrote.
So thank you for proving me right.
EDIT: You must feel really powerful when you mod down people, right? Nothing like bashing other persons with lies, damned lies and statistics, eh?
[sarcasm]Yes because statistics are completely pointless[/sarcasm].
When someone shows you some evidence (while you have shown none) that doesn't fit in with your already entrenched view on the world, you decide you don't like the results, then do what most zealots do and attack the method of collection.
Edited 2010-12-18 16:42 UTC
The country with the largest share of Linux users is the Vatican ?: http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-VA-monthly-200911-201011
If you look at the charts for mobile vs Linux, you'll notice that the hugely successful iPad is still not nearly as big as Ubuntu. The iPhone, the most hyped gadget the last few years, is still only slightly bigger than all Linuxes minus Android.
http://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2010-10/SquidRepor...
Yet some people will claim that the desktop is dead and mobile is the new king. Others will pretend Linux is a dismal failure compared to the same equally small mobile space.
Fact is, though, that Linux is big enough to sustain a healthy developer community, which in turn makes it a usable desktop platform for most purposes. For the rest, you need Photoshop.
I'll see your satcounter, and raise you a w3schools.
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp
5% finally, at Nov 2011.
There is a lot of inertia to overcome here, especially since ordinary consumers are not allowed to buy GNU/Linux systems in stores. Having said that, slowly perhaps the rules excluding Linux from competing are beginning to change:
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/71481.html
Really, the thing to be overcome is a lack of end user familiarity with Linux desktop applications. Just because Linux desktop applications are not exactly the same as more familiar equivalents on Windows, by no means are the Linux desktop applications inferior. The problem is that most people are not aware of this.
http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/2010/12/user-familiarity-software-...
User Familiarity != Software Superiority





Member since:
2010-01-07
On the desktop Linux' main area is Europe (at least when considering 1st and 2nd world countries).
StatCounter has a useful global breakdown by region and country.
You can begin here:
http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-eu-monthly-200911-201011
and then take a look at the charts for the UK, Germany, France and so on.
This is not a success story. It is a picture of failure on a global scale.
You might also take a look at the European charts for Mobile OS and Mobile vs Desktop.