Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 00:10 UTC, submitted by SReilly
Thread beginning with comment 454555
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-12
from the linked article: -""sales by local artists in the top 50 have fallen by an estimated 65 percent between 2004 and 2009.".
Something read from almost everywhere !
Some facts to take into considerations:
- How many "so called artists" are local ones (Spanish, etc) ?
- How many are coming from the US ?
- From 2004 to 2010, there is a very wide choice of songs/singers. So, What the proportion of newcomers artists in this period ?
- From 2004 to 2010... How evolve the incomes of the indirect (agents, producers, etc) against the ones of the artists ?
Now my point of view:
Top 50 has became like junk food:
- "Sale a lot of hamburgers, cheap to produce, make a lot of money with it, and too bad if consumers have a heart attack with them."