Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Dec 2010 19:19 UTC
Windows The rumours about Windows possibly being ported to ARM has left a lot of people bewildered; why would you port Windows NT when Windows CE 6.0 is a perfectly capable operating system? Putting all the pieces together, it's actually quite clear why you would want Windows NT on ARM: servers.
Thread beginning with comment 454861
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26

So they'll be saving every company $30 on average by porting everything over to ARM, assuming that they are both capable of handling the required work load.


The energy savings will not even be worth the cost of planning the transition for the typical business. By the time ARM servers are cost effective x64 cpus will be even cheaper.

Reply Parent Score: 2