Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th Dec 2010 23:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 455050
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Not only because it's a full blown OS
by jaxx on Wed 29th Dec 2010 18:43
in reply to "RE[3]: Not only because it's a full blown OS"
Some actually tried pushing a "Global Licence" fee to be honest... Something like a few bucks per year which would allow you to download anything you want.
Problem is that everyone would have had to pay for it, even those who wouldn't want to.
So that proposal didn't last long. Sadly, but I totally get why some didn't want to hear about it.




Member since:
2010-05-19
Heh.
To me, this says "If they're charging you for something, you should do it".
They want a fee for copying things? Copy them. Now you've gotten your money's worth.
Sounds like a government-instituted subscription plan, to me.
If they sue, you can argue you've already paid ;þ