Linked by robojerk on Thu 30th Dec 2010 00:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 455229
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by kaiwai
by Neolander on Fri 31st Dec 2010 11:24
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by kaiwai"
Because I have 200GB of music and I don't feel inclined to re-encode all my music again simply to 'stick it to the man'.
Alright, but is there a sufficient number of people in this situation for it being worth implementing AAC on the manufacturer's side ?
I mean, Vorbis costs them only development time and it's already too much. As you said yourself, AAC costs even more development time, and as a bonus caveat you've got to pay for it.
If I'm not misunderstood, most people who own lots of AAC files are iTunes Store users, meaning the part of iPod customers which would be the hardest to convince of switching to another media player.
Edited 2010-12-31 11:31 UTC
Alright, but is there a sufficient number of people in this situation for it being worth implementing AAC on the manufacturer's side ?
By default iTunes is setup to rip and encode CD's in AAC hence even if many customers aren't end users of the iTunes store they've most likely ripped their music in AAC by virtue of the default setting. I know my sister who pretty much represents Jane Sixpack that simply sticks with the defaults.
I mean, Vorbis costs them only development time and it's already too much. As you said yourself, AAC costs even more development time, and as a bonus caveat you've got to pay for it.
But they're happy to license WMA/WMV which is dead? seems to be crazy to reject AAC in favour of supporting another format that next to no one uses.
If I'm not misunderstood, most people who own lots of AAC files are iTunes Store users, meaning the part of iPod customers which would be the hardest to convince of switching to another media player.
As mentioned above - its all about the defaults and how most end users don't stray from them.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Because I have 200GB of music and I don't feel inclined to re-encode all my music again simply to 'stick it to the man'.