
"In the physical world, we have the right to print and sell books. Anyone trying to stop us would need to go to court. That right is weak in the UK (consider superinjunctions), but at least it exists. However, to set up a web site we need the cooperation of a domain name company, an ISP, and often a hosting company, any of which can be pressured to cut us off. In the US, no law explicitly requires this precarity. Rather, it is embodied in contracts that we have allowed those companies to establish as normal. It is as if we all lived in rented rooms and landlords could evict anyone at a moment's notice."
Recommended reading. I'm no fan of Stallman, but despite a bit too much dramatisation towards the end, this article aptly illustrates in layman's terms why the 'net needs to be free, open, and unregulated.
Member since:
2005-11-13
I find the following quote from the article interesting:
You know, it's interesting... when people attempt to defend piracy (or copyright infringement), they say it is not the same as walking into a store and stealing the physical content, because digital and physical content are not the same. On the other hand, some of these same people cry and scream when they can't sell digital content, because afterall, if I can sell a physical book, why couldn't I sell a virtual one? I mean, they're the same thing, right? Well, you're gonna have to decide whether physical/digital goods are the same or not. You can't claim the two are the same/different only when it's convenient. (Same logic applies to content owners as well).
As for Amazon's DRM on ebooks, I have one word for you - unswindle. Look it up. I don't have a problem with buying DRM'd content, as long as I can crack it