Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 15th Oct 2005 15:56 UTC
RISC OS The debate over whether or not RISC OS should be open sourced took another turn this week when Peter Naulls argued that "certain parts" of the OS could be released under an open source licence. The State-side coder behind various ports including Firefox said this would ideally include "crucial parts that affect all users, even if they don't realise it, parts that can be created from scratch and made much better than the Acorn original, and parts which can managed by specific developers who already understand them well."
Thread beginning with comment 45570
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
here, dammit
by MYOB on Sat 15th Oct 2005 20:21 UTC
Member since:

Now, every single thing on the web that refers to RISC OS as "RiscOS", "Risc OS", etc, is COMPLETELY WRONG. Its like the "BEOS" references (When its BeOS). And you went and repeated that which was wrong as it if it was right.

Reply Score: 1

RE: here, dammit
by Andrew Youll on Sat 15th Oct 2005 20:58 in reply to "here, dammit"
Andrew Youll Member since:

Thank you thats all I wanted, a link explaining what Risc/os was / is.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE: here, dammit
by kaiwai on Sun 16th Oct 2005 02:43 in reply to "here, dammit"
kaiwai Member since:

Just to nit pick a little, it is more commonly referred to as MIPS OS ;)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: here, dammit
by nii_ on Mon 17th Oct 2005 03:25 in reply to "here, dammit"
nii_ Member since:

Is that Blue Eyed OS (BEOS) you are talking about? ;)

Is that thing still running?

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: here, dammit
by on Mon 17th Oct 2005 14:08 in reply to "RE: here, dammit"
Member since:

Ummm...I do remeber Blue Eyed OS, I wonder how they went. The best I attempt I have seen so far is OpenBeOS/HaikuOS

Reply Parent Score: 0