Linked by Razvan T. Coloja on Mon 3rd Jan 2011 23:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 455854
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Can't compare it to Android.
by nt_jerkface on Tue 4th Jan 2011 20:46
in reply to "RE[3]: Can't compare it to Android. "
RE[5]: Can't compare it to Android.
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 4th Jan 2011 21:04
in reply to "RE[4]: Can't compare it to Android. "
If you have multiple users accessing the same computer then you need file separation.
And how many home computers are accessed by multiple users?
Hint: few.
I can't find the damn link, but I believe the results from Microsoft's Customer Experience Improvement Program showed like 90% of machines having only one user (the owner). There is no need whatsoever to DEMAND multiuser OR ELSE. There ARE other ways to make machines secure. Why focus on a fringe use case (i.e., home computers with multiple users), when you're such a small effort?
RE[5]: Can't compare it to Android.
by izomiac on Tue 4th Jan 2011 21:31
in reply to "RE[4]: Can't compare it to Android. "
If multiple humans use a computer, then do some home folder redirection at boot and you're done. Letting multiple users log in simultaneously is much harder, and it's a mainframe carry-over that's been rehashed into a security measure.
IMHO, it's not even a particularly good security model as you need things like UAC and sudo, your home directory isn't protected, and the prevalence of privilege escalation exploits suggest it's difficult to properly implement.





Member since:
2006-04-07
There are other ways to protect system files then to think in root/user.