Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Jan 2011 21:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 456080
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
First, anyone over the age of twelve who uses the phrase "Windows tax" is almost certainly not going to be enlightening company.
What should I call it then? How about, "The Additional Cost Applied to the Computer System for the License To Use The Included Microsoft Software, Which Is Hard [If Not Impossible] To Get Refunded?" Is that better?
Secondly, one man's pain is another's pleasure. While you clearly have deep-seated issues related to Microsoft, more than a few of us actually like their products and would disagree strongly with your opinion of them.
I can't complain as much now as I could in the past about the quality of Microsoft's operating systems; Windows 7 is admittedly halfway decent. Now, it's mostly their monopoly status, their forcing their OS (or at least payment) onto everyone who doesn't choose to get even more gouged by buying an Apple, the ridiculous prices of their OSes, and their ridiculous technical and EULA limitations, etc. Not to mention their horrible customer service, outsourced to some cheap foreign country. And their "product activation" and "genuine advantage" crap that makes it almost a guarantee that you'll have to deal with them at some point.
Similarly, I quite appreciate having access to operating systems (XP SP3 and Windows 7) that have never actually crashed on me. That's rather more than I can say for any of my often ill-fated encounters with Linux distros.
Oh, man. You would get bored as hell hearing about all the blue screens of death I got in XP, as well as previous versions of Windows. One standout, I recall, was one of XP's earlier service packs; downloading torrents would never fail to cause a BSOD, and that annoying bug existed until SP2 finally came out. The only fix until SP2: Don't download torrents or any other highly network-straining programs, or downgrade to the previous service pack. Let me just say, from around 1997 until sometime in 2006, I've seen Windows crash and burn spectacularly more times than I can count.
Edited 2011-01-06 01:22 UTC
Not monopoly status, ABUSE of monopoly status. That needs to be kept explicit. We don't want microsoft stifling more innovation through strong arming vendors, running under the table deals, playing dirty with pushing "standards", the list goes on.
I personally don't like visual studio one bit, its pretty clunky and non intuitive and worse...forces users into its developmental paradigm. That tends to be true of most ides but is more true of VS. And then there's the insanity of not being able to mix and match libraries at will...static/dynamic/thread mode/debug utterly maddening.
What should I call it then? How about, "The Additional Cost Applied to the Computer System for the License To Use The Included Microsoft Software, Which Is Hard [If Not Impossible] To Get Refunded?" Is that better?
Hang on a second: presumably, you're opposed to the idea of using Windows either because you simply don't like the product or you find it distasteful from a purely ideological standpoint. Either of those are perfectly fine reasons not to use it. Moreover, you don't want to buy a computer with Windows pre-installed because you regard it as a "tax" (which it isn't) and you believe it may be difficult to obtain a refund for the unused copy of Windows.
Here's a simple solution: don't buy a computer with Windows pre-installed.
forcing their OS (or at least payment) onto everyone who doesn't choose to get even more gouged by buying an Apple
Yes, that's right, you're forced to pay for their OS... notwithstanding the fact every city of any decent size has dozens of small computer retailers who will happily build/sell you a computer without Windows.
If you're too lazy to shop anywhere other than Best Buy or Staples, well then that obviously must be Microsoft's fault... somehow.





Member since:
2010-10-27
First, anyone over the age of twelve who uses the phrase "Windows tax" is almost certainly not going to be enlightening company.
Secondly, one man's pain is another's pleasure. While you clearly have deep-seated issues related to Microsoft, more than a few of us actually like their products and would disagree strongly with your opinion of them.
Personally, for instance, I can't imagine having a machine without a copy of Visual Studio, which is - by a country mile - the best IDE I've ever used. Similarly, I quite appreciate having access to operating systems (XP SP3 and Windows 7) that have never actually crashed on me. That's rather more than I can say for any of my often ill-fated encounters with Linux distros.