Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 7th Jan 2011 18:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 456409
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: It is the web's influence
by orestes on Sat 8th Jan 2011 01:06
in reply to "RE[2]: It is the web's influence"
Oh I agree. Reinventing the wheel without a damn good reason is just silly. I *hate* web designers who insist on using the latest whiz-bang tech the W3C or Adobe/MS can churn out for no better reason than making perfectly fine older content more pretty (and about 20 times more resource heavy).
RE[3]: It is the web's influence
by aliquis on Sat 8th Jan 2011 09:16
in reply to "RE[2]: It is the web's influence"




Member since:
2006-07-26
Hmm... perhaps that is why I (and a vocal group of others) find webpage functional inconsistencies to be so annoying. To me, webpages are documents, and an interactive one is like a shared document. The viewer (i.e. web browser) renders them consistently despite their quite varied appearance.
For example, hyperlinks have a variety of ways you can interact with them (e.g. middle click, tab to select, drag to toolbar, etc.), so when some moron uses flash or javascript to replicate only a single aspect of their functionality, it's infuriating. OTOH, perhaps I'm a dinosaur fearing the meteor that is the gradual unification of the viewer and the document, the application and the webpage.