Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jan 2011 16:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 457027
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Depends on how you define 4G:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-is-sprints-android-po...
Given how casually '4G' is thrown around, and the specifications for that said phone, I most certainly wouldn't call it a 4G device any more than AT&T trying to claim that its HSDPA+ network is some how '4G'. Sorry, just because you really like the sound of 4G and slap it on anything you see fit it doesn't change the fact that it isn't 4G. The said device uses CDMA for its data and voice, it has the capacity to use wimax but it is still using CDMA 99% of the time for what it needs to do.
When iPhone 4 was released it didn't have 4G while other phones out at the time did (Sprint's Evo).
Now they come out with a Verizon version that is exactly the same which means its now even more behind.
Now they come out with a Verizon version that is exactly the same which means its now even more behind.
Not really an issue for me, since 4G (at least on Verizon) is ridiculously expensive, and 3g currently does everything I need it to do. If I can view Google Maps and stream Slacker radio (which I can on 3g), I'm pretty happy.




Member since:
2006-07-26
When iPhone 4 was released it didn't have 4G while other phones out at the time did (Sprint's Evo).
Now they come out with a Verizon version that is exactly the same which means its now even more behind.