Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jan 2011 16:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 457045
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Depends on how you define 4G:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/23/htc-evo-4g-is-sprints-android-po...
Given how casually '4G' is thrown around, and the specifications for that said phone, I most certainly wouldn't call it a 4G device any more than AT&T trying to claim that its HSDPA+ network is some how '4G'. Sorry, just because you really like the sound of 4G and slap it on anything you see fit it doesn't change the fact that it isn't 4G. The said device uses CDMA for its data and voice, it has the capacity to use wimax but it is still using CDMA 99% of the time for what it needs to do.