Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Jan 2011 20:31 UTC
Internet & Networking And the fallout from Google's decision to drop H.264 support from its Chrome web browser continues to fall. Opera's Haavard - speaking on his own behalf - slammed the article which appeared on Ars Technica earlier today, while Micrsoft's Tim Sneath likened Google's move to the president of the United States banning English in favour of Esperanto. Also within, a rant (there's no other word for it) about the disrespect displayed by H.264 proponents towards the very open source community that saved and invigorated the web.
Thread beginning with comment 457801
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar
by lemur2 on Fri 14th Jan 2011 04:53 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Drumhellar"
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

H.264 may not be open in the same sense as web standards, but neither is VP8.

Web standards are not only royalty-free standards (Like VP8, but nto h.264), but are also developed openly, with input from members of the relevant industries (like h.264, but not VP8)

So, h.264 is open in areas that VP8 is not, and vice-versa.

And, yes, W3C is a niche standards group (which isn't the same as unimportant). They govern technologies related to the transmitting, formatting, and interacting with web pages, and that's it. This is only a subset of Internet technologies.


Nevertheless, HTML5 is a W3C standard.

Oh, and VP8 is indeed open, read the license for yourself:
Streaming license:
http://www.webmproject.org/license/bitstream
Software license:
http://www.webmproject.org/license/software/
Additional IP Rights Grant
http://www.webmproject.org/license/additional/

Individual Contributor License
http://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html

Corporate Contributor License
http://code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html

Reply Parent Score: 3