Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Thu 13th Jan 2011 17:13 UTC, submitted by Michael
Linux "Now that the kernel mode-setting page-flipping for the ATI Radeon DRM kernel module has been merged into the Linux 2.6.38 kernel and the respective bits have been set in the xf86-video-ati DDX, we're in the process of running new open-source ATI graphics benchmarks under Linux. Our initial results (included in this article) show these latest improvements to cause some major performance boosts for the open-source ATI driver as it nears the level of performance of the proprietary Catalyst driver."
Thread beginning with comment 457886
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: great
by lucas_maximus on Fri 14th Jan 2011 12:09 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: great"
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

I am stictly NOT a gamer but I do like to browse the Internet and I do not want my machine to be used as part of a botnet, or as a colection device for my Internet banking passwords.


Windows does not automatically become part of a botnet ... stop spreading FUD.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: great
by lemur2 on Fri 14th Jan 2011 12:51 in reply to "RE[4]: great"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"I am stictly NOT a gamer but I do like to browse the Internet and I do not want my machine to be used as part of a botnet, or as a colection device for my Internet banking passwords.


Windows does not automatically become part of a botnet ... stop spreading FUD.
"

Where did I say it did?

Do you deny that botnets are composed of Windows machines?

As I said, I do not want my machine to become part of a botnet. This is not FUD, it is fact ... I really, truly do not want my machine to become part of a botnet.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: great
by lucas_maximus on Fri 14th Jan 2011 13:25 in reply to "RE[5]: great"
lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

You inferred it. You infer a lot of things on here and then say "I never actually said that", when everyone knews what you meant.

It is really pathectic tbh.

Also Linux isn't immune ... after doing a quick google I found these in the first page.

http://lwn.net/Articles/222153/
http://www.itworld.com/security/77499/first-linux-botnet
http://blogs.computerworld.com/14723/no_more_linux_security_braggin...

Considering I have actually had to fix some Linux Boxes (when working as a network admin) that were sending out spam emails because that had been compromised ... nothing is immune.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: great
by BallmerKnowsBest on Fri 14th Jan 2011 23:07 in reply to "RE[4]: great"
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

"I am stictly NOT a gamer but I do like to browse the Internet and I do not want my machine to be used as part of a botnet, or as a colection device for my Internet banking passwords.


Windows does not automatically become part of a botnet ... stop spreading FUD.
"

If you read lemming2's recent posts, you'll see that he's adopted a new talking point to justify that position. His argument is essentially that all closed source software should be presumed to contain malware, because you can't prove with 100% certainty that it doesn't. Which is exactly the reasoning used by people who say "if you value privacy, then you must have something to hide."

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: great
by Nth_Man on Sat 15th Jan 2011 11:28 in reply to "RE[5]: great"
Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

If you read lemming2's recent posts, you'll see that he's adopted a new talking point to justify that position. His argument is essentially that all closed source software should be presumed to contain malware, because you can't prove with 100% certainty that it doesn't. Which is exactly the reasoning used by people who say "if you value privacy, then you must have something to hide."

A post so full of mistakes that is beyond all recovery.

Reply Parent Score: 1