Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Jan 2011 22:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 458185
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-03
These are the kinds of statements people take and run with it.
WebM wasn't an option at the initial iDevice startup and even now hardware support is just appearing. So it wasn't really a choice not to use it or support it. per sa.
There is also nothing stoping Apple from supporting this in the future, and Flash as well. At the current time both WebM and Flash weren't suitable for the battery lasting devices Apple was selling.
The iPad especially is a content consuming device and if/when there is a mass conversion to WebM with no h.264 fallback you'll see iOS devices change.