Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jan 2011 22:18 UTC, submitted by alinandrei
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu De kogel is door de kerk. After years of focussing entirely on Gtk+ and GNOME, Ubuntu will finally start evaluating Qt applications for inclusion in the defaukt Ubuntu installation. Mark Shuttleworth announced the policy change on his blog today.
Thread beginning with comment 458940
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Talk about arrogance
by segedunum on Tue 18th Jan 2011 23:25 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Talk about arrogance"
segedunum
Member since:
2005-07-06

Why is that not a valid approach? What does KDE have to lose if Qt devs implement dconf suport?

That's an odd slant you've put on this. Qt developers haven't decided anything. You're rather jumping ahead of yourself here.

It won't be Qt developers implementing this. It's being done by someone, in a fork for the timebeing, in a way that has already been decided. I don't get the impression many people have been consulted. I suggest you read Mark's post. No one apart from Ubuntu has decided that dconf is even the right direction to go in.

Oh, and probably because it's the same approach Shuttleworth has generally used over the years, and he's always ended up being wrong and hurting everyone in the process? Shuttleworth, Canonical and Ubuntu don't exactly have a track record of being right.

Let's not be naive here. Shuttleworth and Ubuntu have been dragged kicking and screaming into accepting Qt. The only way this will work for them is if they end up with some applications they can use, and they don't get to decide that.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Talk about arrogance
by Soulbender on Wed 19th Jan 2011 09:13 in reply to "RE[6]: Talk about arrogance"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

It's being done by someone, in a fork for the timebeing, in a way that has already been decide


Writing a QSettings plugin is not creating a fork.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[8]: Talk about arrogance
by segedunum on Wed 19th Jan 2011 14:19 in reply to "RE[7]: Talk about arrogance"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

Writing a QSettings plugin is not creating a fork.

If it's being done outside of Qt's source tree and hasn't yet been accepted then it's a fork for the timebeing.

Reply Parent Score: 2