Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jan 2011 22:18 UTC, submitted by alinandrei
Thread beginning with comment 459025
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
Correct. Exactly so. That is precisely what you would expect them to do.
However, when said Qt applications are installed on a default Ubuntu (with modified qtconfig and QSettings class, both now integrated with dconf) now, suddenly, when the Ubuntu user changes something like the system font (using dconf), suddenly any installed Qt applications will also see the same change.
Which is what you want.
Without requiring said authors of QT applications to change their code at all, or even have to recompile.
Puhlease, get real. What everybody wants is for it to work properly, without putting extra work on the authors of thousands of Qt applications.
This is not any kind of anti-Ubuntu campaign, this is simply a "if you want to integrate Qt applications, do it properly and everybody wins" campaign.
Edited 2011-01-19 09:33 UTC