Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jan 2011 22:18 UTC, submitted by alinandrei
Thread beginning with comment 459144
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Kick Shuttleworth to the curb
by ple_mono on Thu 20th Jan 2011 02:40
in reply to "Kick Shuttleworth to the curb"
Oracle is considered the evil empire of Linuxland and yet they contribute more to the kernel (btrfs).
So that is how you measure worthiness in "Linuxland"? That shouldn't be an obligation. You do what you do best, and i do what i do best. As long as it's free, who cares.
The word Linux is not on the Ubuntu website
http://www.ubuntu.com/
What kind of ass doesn't mention Linux on a website for a Linux based operating system? Compare it to Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/index.html
http://www.ubuntu.com/
What kind of ass doesn't mention Linux on a website for a Linux based operating system? Compare it to Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/index.html
So what? It's not on the front page. Anyone that's interested can find out for themselves. http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu
I don't put my moms name on my shirt, so people know where i come from. If they're so interested, they can ask. Seriously.
Shuttleworth wants to turn the Linux desktop into a purple Mac junior. You guys gave him a fair chance and all he has done is wrap a debian distro in marketing.
Yes. And I like it. Good for me?
RE[2]: Kick Shuttleworth to the curb
by nt_jerkface on Thu 20th Jan 2011 08:55
in reply to "RE: Kick Shuttleworth to the curb"
So that is how you measure worthiness in "Linuxland"? That shouldn't be an obligation.
It's just an observation. Oracle gets bashed and derided for building off RHEL even though they contribute btrfs and yet Ubuntu gets a free pass and contributes nothing.
So what? It's not on the front page. Anyone that's interested can find out for themselves.
It says a lot about his true intentions. He wants to disassociate Linux from Ubuntu in the public's mind.
I don't really care but I'm surprised by how many in Linuxland are on board with him. If Ubuntu ever got anywhere with the public he would no doubt push some type of application lock-in. He would probably go the Google route of using a non-standard (but open source) API to discourage porting.
RE: Kick Shuttleworth to the curb
by jbauer on Thu 20th Jan 2011 19:40
in reply to "Kick Shuttleworth to the curb"
Given Linux's track record on desktop and consumer systems, can you blame them?
That is not the problem. What's wrong with Ubuntu is that they're not doing anything that others haven't tried before. It's nothing but logical that they're failing exactly like the others did.





Member since:
2009-08-26
Oracle is considered the evil empire of Linuxland and yet they contribute more to the kernel (btrfs).
The word Linux is not on the Ubuntu website
http://www.ubuntu.com/
What kind of ass doesn't mention Linux on a website for a Linux based operating system? Compare it to Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/index.html
Shuttleworth wants to turn the Linux desktop into a purple Mac junior. You guys gave him a fair chance and all he has done is wrap a debian distro in marketing.