Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Jan 2011 22:18 UTC, submitted by alinandrei
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu De kogel is door de kerk. After years of focussing entirely on Gtk+ and GNOME, Ubuntu will finally start evaluating Qt applications for inclusion in the defaukt Ubuntu installation. Mark Shuttleworth announced the policy change on his blog today.
Thread beginning with comment 459147
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Kick Shuttleworth to the curb
by ple_mono on Thu 20th Jan 2011 02:40 UTC in reply to "Kick Shuttleworth to the curb"
ple_mono
Member since:
2005-07-26

Oracle is considered the evil empire of Linuxland and yet they contribute more to the kernel (btrfs).

So that is how you measure worthiness in "Linuxland"? That shouldn't be an obligation. You do what you do best, and i do what i do best. As long as it's free, who cares.

The word Linux is not on the Ubuntu website
http://www.ubuntu.com/

What kind of ass doesn't mention Linux on a website for a Linux based operating system? Compare it to Oracle:
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/index.html

So what? It's not on the front page. Anyone that's interested can find out for themselves. http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu
I don't put my moms name on my shirt, so people know where i come from. If they're so interested, they can ask. Seriously.

Shuttleworth wants to turn the Linux desktop into a purple Mac junior. You guys gave him a fair chance and all he has done is wrap a debian distro in marketing.

Yes. And I like it. Good for me?

Reply Parent Score: 2

nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26

So that is how you measure worthiness in "Linuxland"? That shouldn't be an obligation.


It's just an observation. Oracle gets bashed and derided for building off RHEL even though they contribute btrfs and yet Ubuntu gets a free pass and contributes nothing.

So what? It's not on the front page. Anyone that's interested can find out for themselves.

It says a lot about his true intentions. He wants to disassociate Linux from Ubuntu in the public's mind.

I don't really care but I'm surprised by how many in Linuxland are on board with him. If Ubuntu ever got anywhere with the public he would no doubt push some type of application lock-in. He would probably go the Google route of using a non-standard (but open source) API to discourage porting.

Reply Parent Score: 3

ple_mono Member since:
2005-07-26

It's just an observation. Oracle gets bashed and derided for building off RHEL even though they contribute btrfs and yet Ubuntu gets a free pass and contributes nothing.

Fair enough. But in my mind oracle shouldn't have been bashed for that either.

It says a lot about his true intentions. He wants to disassociate Linux from Ubuntu in the public's mind.

Yes, you may be right. But here's food for thought: what if that is what is needed for linux to actually grow on the "average user". You can't argue with the stamp (many) people put on linux users today. But if you sneak in the backdoor, maybe they don't notice how nice it is until they are already using linux. See? Maybe he's doing it, intentionally, for a good purpose. But then again, maybe i'm too blue eyed.

I don't really care but I'm surprised by how many in Linuxland are on board with him. If Ubuntu ever got anywhere with the public he would no doubt push some type of application lock-in. He would probably go the Google route of using a non-standard (but open source) API to discourage porting.

Perhaps. But, he's obviously trying to go his own way, and that annoys people to no end. What's wrong with coming up with something more popular than the "upstream" product (especially if upstream refuses to even consider to merge it in), if people genuinely like it better?

Reply Parent Score: 2