Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Thu 20th Jan 2011 21:16 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 459331
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, if you implemented the JVM in a "safer" language like Java, how the hell would it run ?
Actually it has already been done:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/MaxineVM/Home;jsessionid=383E286046FA9...
Still, there are lots of safe languages to choose from in the TIOBE top 50. I did not say that the JVM had to be coded in Java.
Besides, C(++) can be secure, when people know what they're doing with it (e.g. don't use scanf and char* apart for very low-level stuff where they can't do otherwise, think of the "delete" as soon as they've written a "new" somewhere, things like that)
I hear this excuse a lot, the problem is that it does not work in the real world. Contrary to what you may think, I do know C and C++ pretty well, and I also do have the experience what means to have multi-site development across the globe in such languages in the corporate world.
The result is not always pretty, there are tons of developers that should have never been allowed to touch C or C++, but they were.




Member since:
2010-03-08
Well, if you implemented the JVM in a "safer" language like Java, how the hell would it run ?
Besides, C(++) can be secure, when people know what they're doing with it (e.g. don't use scanf and char* apart for very low-level stuff where they can't do otherwise, think of the "delete" as soon as they've written a "new" somewhere, things like that)
Edited 2011-01-21 16:08 UTC