To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It isn't.
Abolish copyright? Where did you get that idea? I don't think I have ever argued we should abolish copyright.
It's not the abolishment of copyright, but simply a reform.
Personally I think in some ways copyright should be more like patents, in that they have an expiration date.
I mean these publishers who are still making money off of books of long dead authors are basically scum, if you think about it in the respect that they are making money off of dead people.
Copyright should last for 15-20 years, then after that it should be considered public domain.
I'm all for that.
Agreed; if one can't make a profit off an idea within 15-30 years then quite frankly the idea mustn't have been all that good to begin with. I can understand protecting artists whilst they're alive - they've got to eat and pay rent but why should the gravy train continue long after the artist has died? both sides (artist and company) have well and truly made their investment back so I fail to see the point of the current status quo.





Member since:
2007-01-08
You people seem to think that the idea that copyright should be abolished and that people should be allowed to infringe copyrights on a massive scale, is something like a mainstream opinion.
It isn't.
You people get on sites like that and basically all tell each other how insightful the opinions you share are, and you think that reflects the opinions of most real people in real life.
You are very wrong.
There is a reason why no politicians support copyright abolition: most people don't like it. If you look at the huge jury awards against file-sharers, you will get a better idea of what real people think, then you currently are getting in echo chambers like these.