Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Jan 2011 22:34 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 459989
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Good numbers overall
by JohnJJ on Fri 28th Jan 2011 07:48
in reply to "RE: Good numbers overall"
RE[3]: Good numbers overall
by acobar on Fri 28th Jan 2011 14:18
in reply to "RE[2]: Good numbers overall"
RE[2]: Good numbers overall
by flanque on Fri 28th Jan 2011 09:45
in reply to "RE: Good numbers overall"
RE[3]: Good numbers overall
by kaiwai on Sat 29th Jan 2011 04:22
in reply to "RE[2]: Good numbers overall"
Developing a solid middleware stack aint that easy and the competitors are fierce. Besides there already are well established Windows compatible middleware vendors out there.
There is always buying out Quark - work on Expression Studio and maybe develop a home grown Photoshop replacement. Expand the games side of the business, maybe buy out some niche product areas such as Solidworks etc.
RE[2]: Good numbers overall
by glarepate on Sat 29th Jan 2011 00:59
in reply to "RE: Good numbers overall"
Member since:
2005-07-06
Maybe bringing Windows to ARM is done in anticipation of this.
But the decrease is in dollar value rather than actual units - correct? that could be explained through the growth of Windows variants at a lower price thus lower profit margin. Personally I think that Microsoft would be better off developing a broader middleware than trying to flog the same old two products over and over again - how about an alternative to Adobe Creative Suite