Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Feb 2011 22:44 UTC, submitted by LouisBarman
Google The web is already aflame with Google's accusation that Bing is stealing its search results. Google created code to manually rank certain bogus search terms, and ten created mock web pages as the top search results for these bogus terms. It turned out that Bing would list the exact same mock web pages as its top search result for these bogus terms. Google is unhappy with it, but in all honesty - since when is it wrong to copy in the computer business?
Thread beginning with comment 460565
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by durango99
by durango99 on Tue 1st Feb 2011 23:28 UTC
durango99
Member since:
2011-02-01

I don't quite buy the argument that this example of MS using opt-in data from users searching google as a normal everyday tech copying tech.

Sure Bing competes and copies Google on the merit of using it's own system and algorithm to crawl the web and generate search. That I'd buy as normal tech copying tech. They are doing searches using their own tools.

This however is a clever way of leeching search results from your competitor. It's not copying, it's more like siphoning gas from your neighbor's car gas tank ;)

Edited 2011-02-01 23:29 UTC

Reply Score: 1

RE: Comment by durango99
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 1st Feb 2011 23:30 in reply to "Comment by durango99"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

No it isn't. It's more like following your neighbour to see where he buys his gas.

Reply Parent Score: 8

RE[2]: Comment by durango99
by Kroc on Wed 2nd Feb 2011 10:01 in reply to "RE: Comment by durango99"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

No, it's more like running a business that tells people where the cheapest gas is, and instead of going out and finding the cheapest gas, you just follow your competitor around.

It works, but you are wholly dependent on your competitor to serve your own customers. That is no good position to be in, esp. for Bing.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: Comment by durango99
by leonalpha on Wed 2nd Feb 2011 17:55 in reply to "RE: Comment by durango99"
leonalpha Member since:
2011-02-02

No Thom, that's not how it is. It's like your neighbor spending 10 years to build a system that allows people to find where the cheapest gas. The system works exceptionally well and your neighbor charges a fee for using it.

Then you come along and ask everyone who uses your neighbor's system to tell you where the cheapest gas is. And then, you charge a fee to redistribute your neighbor's results. Do you seriously not see anything wrong with this?

Microsft, and any other company, can copy someone else's work by studying it, then creating their own. This is what Apple, Google, and everybody else in the industry does. However, that is not what Bing is doing.

Ponder the following:

On Google

- Thom: Hi Google, can you please tell me where the cheapest gas is?

- Google: Sure, hang on... [hours go by, then Google comes back... sweaty, tired, sore, short of breath] Here you go sir, I finally figured out where the cheapest gas is. It took a lot of work, but here it is. That'll be 50 bucks.


Now on Bing

- Leon: Hi Bing, can you please tell me where the cheapest gas is?

- Bing: Sure, hang on...

[Bing searches and finds nothing - Oh Crap! then sees Thom passing by...]

- Bing to Thom [whispers]: psst, Hey yo, Thom!!! Did Google just tell you where the cheapest gas is?

- Thom: Yes, it's on 123 Main Street in Thom City, Netherlands. I'm on my way there now.

- Bing: Oh cool. Aight man, peace!

Bing to Leon: Leon, the cheapest gas is on 123 Main Street in Thom City, Netherlands. That'll be 50 bucks!
--------------------------------------------------

If you believe that scenario is perfectly fine, then I have nothing else to say.

Reply Parent Score: 2