Linked by fran on Tue 1st Feb 2011 23:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 460606
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Look at their C*O salaries perhaps?
by elsewhere on Wed 2nd Feb 2011 22:20
in reply to "RE: Look at their C*O salaries perhaps?"
Both Bell and Rogers sell digital video (aka: on demand) over their wires yet it does not count towards my bandwidth cap. These new, lower, caps is their response to competitors like Netflix.
And now that the telcos have been racing to scoop up all of the media companies, this is exactly how the CRTC should solve the problem with one simple ruling: force the telcos to enforce bandwidth caps indiscriminately. No more turning off the meter for their own content and services. If I have to choose between RoD or Netflix, I should do so knowing it is cutting into my bandwidth allocation either way.
Then we'll see how quickly the telcos reassess bandwidth caps and artifical constraints.




Member since:
2006-04-25
The problem in Canada is that the owners of the 'last mile' for the majority of homes are also in the traditional media business.
Both Bell and Rogers sell digital video (aka: on demand) over their wires yet it does not count towards my bandwidth cap. These new, lower, caps is their response to competitors like Netflix.
Edited 2011-02-02 03:23 UTC