Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Feb 2011 16:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 460837
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
XP is basically at end of life....Win 7 is the way to go on that platform. H.264 is just swell as baked into iPhone 4. WebM is not needed on my platforms of choice...ymmv.
Although it is absolutely true to make the observation that XP is basically at end of life, it doesn't matter that this is so.
The fact remains that about half of the web browser clients in use right now, today, are browsers installed under Windows XP.
http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201001-201101
Almost all of these users cannot play HTML5/h.264 web video.
If you were to serve HTML5/h.264 web video, that is a very large set of clients to miss out on.
RE[8]: Happy as Enduser
by TheGZeus on Fri 4th Feb 2011 03:01
in reply to "RE[7]: Happy as Enduser "





Member since:
2006-04-22
It isn't a well-engineered solution at all if it doesn't accomodate a very large contingent of users (Windows XP users), and it doesn't allow one of the major browser writers (non-profit Mozilla) to implement a solution.
On your limited-size iPhone 4 screen, if a player (especially one with GPU hardware acceleration of rendering) were allowed:
XP is basically at end of life....Win 7 is the way to go on that platform. H.264 is just swell as baked into iPhone 4. WebM is not needed on my platforms of choice...ymmv.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Mozilla-releases-Firefox-4-B... href="tel:1182139">1182139.html
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/02/latest-firefox-beta...
WebM videos would be rendered with every bit of the same quality as H.264, to the extent that you could not tell the difference in a blind test. "